Payer-facing FHIR data exchange has its own operating rhythm. The patterns are dominated by the Da Vinci IGs (PDex, CRD, DTR, PAS) and the CMS Interoperability and Patient Access rule, which together set the conformance bar that payer integ
-
-
Two open-source engines dominate the HL7 v2 bridging conversation in 2026: HAPI FHIR with a v2 adapter and Mirth Connect (now sold as NextGen Connect). They solve overlapping problems from opposite directions, and the right pick depends on
-
Lab workflows sit at an awkward intersection of FHIR and legacy HL7 v2. Most reference labs still ship results over v2 ORU messages, while ordering systems are increasingly moving to FHIR ServiceRequest and Observation resources. A FHIR int
-
ACO reporting is the use case where FHIR $export stops being a spec feature and starts being load-bearing infrastructure. An accountable care organization aggregating data across multiple provider organizations needs to ingest population-sc
-
Five FHIR integration engines dominate serious 2026 procurement conversations, each with a recognizable buyer profile. The reviews below are deliberately short; deep evaluation belongs in a pilot with real traffic patterns, not in a roundup
-
A FHIR integration engine is the layer that turns FHIR from a spec into a working bridge between systems. Every non-trivial healthcare deployment ends up with one, and the choice shapes operational ergonomics for years. The 2026 market has
-
Are you the payer engineer who inherited "wire up consent" as a one-line ticket on the CMS-0057-F backlog? The truth is, consent, attribution-of-record, and audit trails are the parts of the rule that trip teams late in the project,…